How Far is Too Far?

To what extent are we willing to accept technological advancements and innovation in sport? With how quickly materials, technologies, training regimes and our understanding of dietary requirements have evolved in recent years, are we beginning to reach the limit of our comfort level? How far is too far?

This question is raised largely due to the recent decision by swimming's governing body, FINA, to restrict the use of advanced swimsuits by competitors and regulate the allowable suits, following the astonishing accomplishments of swimmers at last summer's Olympic Games, and in competitions since. Speedo, the leader in research and development for racing suits for swimmers, has understandably come out in opposition to the new regulations, while many of the world's top swimmers now face the tall task of readjusting to new suits, and new training requirements to match the expectations set in Beijing.

The important debate, however, is not whether FINA is right and justified in its actions, but rather at what point do governing bodies and organizers need to step in to protect the integrity of our games, the history and traditions of our sports, or in some cases, the safety of our athletes.

Major League Baseball has historically resisted calls for implementing replay technology and football-style challenges in order to help (and likely supplement) umpires; despite research into its effectiveness, and a growing list of incidents pointing to its potential uses, football leagues such as the English Premier League have refused to use goal-line technology similar to tennis' Hawk-Eye cameras. Technology has even been developed and tested to aid referees in judging off-side calls in football - given how often FIFA shifts interpretations of the law, would such technology really harm the integrity of the game?

Ultimately, I don't think there's a concrete answer to this debate, nor do I think the FINA decision will be the last of its kind in the coming years. However, I do think those responsible for sport need to begin to take stock of the advancements and benefits of such innovation, as well as account for the potential limitations and dangers. Following the record breaking feats of swimmers in Beijing, and the massive publicity push behind Michael Phelps' incredible gold medal haul, swimming may never have been more popular and followed as it was last summer. Is slowing the competitors down and placing greater limitations on what they wear really the best thing for the sport? Is protecting the standing world records and balancing competition for those unable to afford top of the line Speedos the right path? Evidently FINA believe so, but I'm not so sure...